From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg via help-gnu-emacs Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 03:41:52 +0200 Message-ID: <861s0axh27.fsf@zoho.eu> References: <20190514235412.kncazq45szlum2gr@Ergus> <83v9yb92c7.fsf@gnu.org> <878sv7sp3r.fsf@telefonica.net> <83r28z8zl9.fsf@gnu.org> <20190515210924.sijzy6mnpgzkt4gm@Ergus> <83ftpecwu1.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516161408.4dov3dwk5h4yoizn@Ergus> <838sv6cmwt.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516202327.5cgy2s4kppy3ahxa@Ergus> <871s0yqg2i.fsf@telefonica.net> <06d1ac99-55be-0fe5-8cf5-85456762f699@yandex.ru> <87sgtdnm16.fsf@telefonica.net> <87bm00onz3.fsf@telefonica.net> Reply-To: Emanuel Berg Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="52919"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 04 03:45:18 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hXyVq-000DcK-Ci for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 03:45:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43683 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXyVo-0003Nt-PI for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 21:45:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38428) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXyVe-0003NY-0l for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 21:45:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXyVc-0004e6-Pk for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 21:45:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=38470 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hXyVc-0004ab-HM for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2019 21:45:04 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hXyVa-000DI0-5r for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Jun 2019 03:45:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:wY2oLr7sxgp7C6IGtU7khClZRpw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120733 Archived-At: Óscar Fuentes wrote: > See, I'm not saying that Emacs is perfect or > the users of other editors are lazy fools or > wathever, I'm just saying that converging > towards popular editors is not good per se. > I started with Borland IDEs, then Visual > Studio [...] No matter their popularity, they > are rudimentary editors compared to Emacs. Ah, right! Borland and Visual Studio! But that was a long time ago! We are not comparing us now, with them then, right? (Not that I doubt Emacs was better even then, of course.) -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal