From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some experience with the igc branch Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 21:37:03 +0200 Message-ID: <861pxy42e8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o713wwsi.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ldw7fwet.fsf@protonmail.com> <87a5cnfj8t.fsf@protonmail.com> <86seqe4j4f.fsf@gnu.org> <87ttaucub8.fsf@protonmail.com> <87pllicrpi.fsf@protonmail.com> <864j2u442i.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18794"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com, acorallo@gnu.org To: gerd.moellmann@gmail.com, pipcet@protonmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 23 20:38:01 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tPoFd-0004hX-6R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 20:38:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tPoEp-0007z1-LO; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:37:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tPoEn-0007yb-CQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:37:09 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tPoEm-0003mf-Bk; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 14:37:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=yNEd9Wr2iVRzXpGOewyP9+gEFUVw/6qtGntRBSJbpAU=; b=Xrxl6d3MlG9K6FlmMcJG rwuRSUoaVXwk6UM0KvnVhsAvV66Bkz0BkWo4o1vOAiP9Ado9KBwULAxZ3KA+x+BsOjj2+FzafanYk M8WhK3zUEahw+0S4I1cPHgO9c8h1GwO2DttRbYgFlJ1cZdHektprY8tzSjialFkgO+dyoyKAVbTN7 aQMBXgHqODyaVpxbSnPbRgQDRQp+wAin3KIdbKTddP66+ILxcOW3CtyUh468lxGPW1z73LT7VK/Hz v9bSfuYRWBdMbR/3HoW5ixTtWc4OkM3wPvqCeUikQ+622EPiY73tsHlOVEmfJWs+BGWI22/YWJkvk jX5XeOTpqdZKWw==; In-Reply-To: <864j2u442i.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 23 Dec 2024 21:00:53 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:326933 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 21:00:53 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: pipcet@protonmail.com, ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, > eller.helmut@gmail.com, acorallo@gnu.org > > > From: Gerd Möllmann > > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org, > > eller.helmut@gmail.com, acorallo@gnu.org > > Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 18:44:42 +0100 > > > > BTW, do you know which signal handlers use Lisp, i.e. allocate Lisp > > objects or access some? All? Or, would it be realistic to rewrite signal > > handlers to not do that? > > SIGPROF does (it's the basis for our Lisp profiler). Let me clarify to avoid possible confusion: the SIGPROF handler doesn't run Lisp, but it does access the Lisp machine, via the backtrace_top_function and get_backtrace functions.