From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New "make benchmark" target Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 16:15:33 +0200 Message-ID: <861pxpp88q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h679kftn.fsf@protonmail.com> <87msh0j12c.fsf@protonmail.com> <87zfkyfqia.fsf@protonmail.com> <875xnmf2qp.fsf@protonmail.com> <87y107g0xc.fsf@protonmail.com> <87frm51jkr.fsf@protonmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37160"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acorallo@gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, mattiase@acm.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 30 15:16:38 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tSGZR-0009Yf-Uq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 15:16:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tSGYv-0004AG-OS; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 09:16:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tSGYu-00049r-5V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 09:16:04 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tSGYs-0001Cx-Je; Mon, 30 Dec 2024 09:16:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=3MWlTbg9JUXX9sMzl2CCdrIex+DCMpVRj4UmOKJ+Nig=; b=JK9DnpcCufzA/J8/384m cwepQEqP/QhvtWgfAv5K0AUafqqHRrZt0dX5WkxvBQY+ZiBZCgsjvYnj2X8QB7x36/ncb6aaEBqOg UQjANdmkZhar87PVLynPakYySvURY1pOOIzF/WwaBMwXuQx9+7Ib+PU+o/reaUcMyfB9BKR/6jl9P NwyE3lMRiHqQriV6kz+OkFYzbIMzByL4HvhAsE0EqGx+aCPUpF2SwRfk31W5EmQW/B2Jr6oK/MTLC YF2kL56Et0Uk93ibGrnhQOLpBRIwBfQhrFa07D+zI+zkyVVQssGfo0n8cNfcLMeqA1rBEDBRpXwut Ce/6aMWImLSC5Q==; In-Reply-To: <87frm51jkr.fsf@protonmail.com> (message from Pip Cet on Mon, 30 Dec 2024 11:45:36 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:327423 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2024 11:45:36 +0000 > From: Pip Cet > Cc: Stefan Kangas , Eli Zaretskii , Mattias Engdegård , Paul Eggert , emacs-devel@gnu.org, João Távora > > "Andrea Corallo" writes: > > > I'd personally drop the requirement of using ERT as a framework for > > benchmarks, I'd just move elisp-benchmarks code in emacs core and add > > the target. > > Well, as is obvious from the quoted paragraph, I disagree. I've stated > why in the thread; if someone wants a summary, I can provide one Can you point to the message where you explained your rationale for using ERT for this? I've scanned the discussion, but couldn't find such a message. Thanks.