From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug Database? Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 23:00:20 +0200 Message-ID: <85zmbqn1nf.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <17717.20433.183356.106695@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17718.15996.727727.91417@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17719.20082.610297.834477@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161383650 15687 80.91.229.2 (20 Oct 2006 22:34:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 22:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Frank Schmitt , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 21 00:34:00 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb2w5-0007Zo-A2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:33:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb2w4-0002gQ-El for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:33:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb1Ui-00070z-2u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:01:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb1Uh-00070G-BV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:01:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gb1Uh-00070A-3w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:01:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gb1Ug-0007bh-3H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:01:30 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Gb1UU-00078d-Rs; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:01:19 -0400 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 51CD61CE30C1; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 23:00:20 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri\, 20 Oct 2006 08\:16\:06 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60968 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Frank Schmitt >> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:46:35 +0200 >> >> If gdb had a leader who said "we don't ship broken code", gdb developers >> would be at annoyed because their favorite new feature of which they are >> proud and fond isn't released to the public > > You are forgetting that GDB is used not only to debug C++ programs. > I'm not sure delaying GDB releases until C++ support is completely > fixed is not too harsh towards C developers, Which is basically what lead to the egcs fork at one time. C++ is really a handicap. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum