Re: CPerl Indentation after subs with print in their names

[Stefan Kamphausen <skampi@gmx.net>]

Hi Ilya,

Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> writes:

>> Nevertheless, it was wasted time on my side (comparing those files)
>> and on yours (writing posts) which could have been saved if there were
>> some comments at the beginning of the file that explained the way
>> things are.
>
> Ha, I see you presume people would read what is "at the beginning of
> the file"!  And where you think this "beginning" is, before/after
> license/changelog, or where?

Can't tell.  I won't even assume that other people read all that, but
/I/ do and I always write my stuff as if others would, too :-)

Hm, let's see ... there is this comment:

;; DO NOT FORGET to read micro-docs (available from `Perl' menu)   <<<<<<
;; or as help on variables `cperl-tips', `cperl-problems',         <<<<<<
;; `cperl-praise', `cperl-speed'.				   <<<<<<

Somewhere close to that would be a good idea maybe.  Or it could be a
micro-doc itself.  cperl-development or cperl-versions or
cperl-maintenance or something like that.  

>   [If you can agree on that, I put it into my TODO ;-]

:-)

Regards,
Stefan
-- 
Stefan Kamphausen --- http://www.skamphausen.de
a blessed +42 regexp of confusion (weapon in hand)
You hit. The format string crumbles and turns to dust.