From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:00:48 +0100 Message-ID: <85vehnn9un.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87ps7x4clj.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <85irdpweuq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85649pw652.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172574077 16103 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2007 11:01:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 11:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 27 12:01:08 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HM04x-0001wa-Gu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:01:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HM04x-0003kf-5R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 06:01:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HM04m-0003im-GN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 06:00:56 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HM04l-0003en-17 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 06:00:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HM04k-0003ef-TW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 06:00:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-in-08.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.48]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HM04h-0007D6-Aq; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 06:00:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-in-02-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-02-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.14]) by mail-in-08.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC80327AF13; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:00:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-in-02.arcor-online.net (mail-in-02.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.42]) by mail-in-02-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874C311435C; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:00:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from lola.goethe.zz (dslb-084-061-055-100.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.55.100]) by mail-in-02.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318062D9FF9; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:00:49 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 82B291D17415; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:00:48 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue\, 27 Feb 2007 02\:38\:51 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66918 Richard Stallman writes: > More discussion of who has, and who has not, been inconvenienced by > stealth fontification is not really useful, because we already know > that it is a substantial inconvenience for some users. > > The question now is whether it _avoids_ a substantial inconvenience > for a substantial fraction of users. Well, one pointer would be if we had somebody who turned it off, only to turn it back on later again because of getting inconvenienced. It does not appear like we have such a specimen around. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum