From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:28:20 +0100 Message-ID: <85slctupij.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87ps7x4clj.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <85irdpweuq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85649pw652.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172499753 26522 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2007 14:22:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:22:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 26 15:22:25 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HLgi8-0003Mo-C3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:20:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLgi7-0007md-Kg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:20:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLghu-0007mX-Na for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:20:02 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLght-0007kU-28 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:20:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLghs-0007kR-PK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:20:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-in-07.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.47]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HLghs-00087v-Dp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:20:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-in-01-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-10-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.27]) by mail-in-07.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B075B24B84F; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:19:58 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-in-05.arcor-online.net (mail-in-05.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.45]) by mail-in-01-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F93123D65F; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:28:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from lola.goethe.zz (dslb-084-061-006-098.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.6.98]) by mail-in-05.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDA312EAE2; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:28:21 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 38D151D17413; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 12:28:20 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon\, 26 Feb 2007 12\:26\:25 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66851 Archived-At: "Juanma Barranquero" writes: > On 2/26/07, David Kastrup wrote: > > I don't have an opinion about the setting of the variable, but FWIW > I'm in Andreas' boat: I have it at default value, and I've never > noticed any ill effect. > >> This is particularly noticeable if the noise level of your system >> depends on the CPU load (like increased fan usage). >> >> Would you be likely to notice this on your system? > > Not at work's machine, but definitely on my home's laptop. And I > didn't notice it (not that it didn't happen, but if it *did* happen it > wasn't much of an issue). > > Perhaps a better metric would be: do you always have lots of > buffers? Yes. > I don't. Most of the time I have perhaps two or three (non-special) > buffers open. I tend to quickly close any buffer I'm not working on. Ok, but working with many buffers is not something particularly forbidden. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum