From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 09:42:26 +0100 Message-ID: <85slclwgb1.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172997769 9958 80.91.229.12 (4 Mar 2007 08:42:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 08:42:49 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 04 09:42:44 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HNmIk-0004tZ-Ob for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 09:42:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HNmIk-0000Dw-9C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:42:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HNmIZ-0000Dr-Rb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:42:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HNmIX-0000Df-Bw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:42:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HNmIX-0000Dc-5z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:42:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-in-02.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.42]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HNmIW-0006h0-Pb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Mar 2007 03:42:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.16]) by mail-in-02.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3369F2D9906 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 09:42:27 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-in-11.arcor-online.net (mail-in-11.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.51]) by mail-in-04-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F5EABAE1 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 09:42:27 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from lola.goethe.zz (dslb-084-061-052-195.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.52.195]) by mail-in-11.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09229D0A98 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 09:42:27 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 513121C460D3; Sun, 4 Mar 2007 09:42:26 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat\, 03 Mar 2007 21\:00\:44 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67287 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > I mostly use very fast (3 Ghz) machines nowadays, which are not easily > forced into annoying delays. I could try to find a slower machine, > but I need to know what is the clock speed we consider as > ``reference'' for such investigations. That is, with what slow clock > speeds we would still like Emacs to be reasonably responsive? > > I don't know. I have not kept track of things like that for 15 years. > > But I think that if NONE of the developers now finds this annoying, > that problem will be rare enough that it doesn't count for much. > > So we can set jit-lock-stealth-time to nil. > > Would someone please do that? I have done that and changed the NEWS entry accordingly, too. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum