From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot? Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 21:02:48 +0200 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <85sla1c1bb.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <133h07p3lok86ee@corp.supernews.com> <85ejly2rre.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85lkg5y28l.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <854pmrtjol.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <200705120631.l4C6VPlt006033@localhost.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178998401 22535 80.91.229.12 (12 May 2007 19:33:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 19:33:21 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 12 21:33:20 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HmxLA-000579-Jz for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 May 2007 21:33:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HmxSj-0002Ym-CY for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 May 2007 15:41:05 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!newsfeed.freenet.de!news.n-ix.net!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.98 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:tDPiqXH0c5Xp8+Iv3fbi4AxRda0= Original-Lines: 24 Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 12 May 2007 21:02:44 CEST Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 24cd01e0.newsspool2.arcor-online.net Original-X-Trace: DXC=blMociT@^8?LNKYb?b>076A9EHlD; 3Yc24Fo<]lROoR18kF5MOK`; S:bhJ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:43928 Archived-At: wbp@nodomain.invalid (Will Parsons) writes: > Maciej Katafiasz wrote: >> Den Sat, 12 May 2007 08:31:25 +0200 skrev Xavier Maillard: >> >>> If I was not coding modes/packages for GNU Emacs, I would have >>> probably sticked to GNU Emacs 21.x, for sure. >> >> Using Emacs 21.x now is simply silly. With 22 being almost there, it's as >> much, or more stable than 21.x, and it has *tons* of overall improvements, > > So, you didn't see my response to another post in this thread, mentioning > that I'm having problems editing remote files with the current Emacs 22 on > Windows? Then, for heaven's sake, file a bug report. M-x report-emacs-bug RET Or you will have the same problem with a _released_ version of Emacs later. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum