From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs vista build failures Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:47:27 +0200 Message-ID: <85sku28lfk.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <36366a980807101702r5677d096g8e62ef5b3e278868@mail.gmail.com> <20080713214648.GB1076@muc.de> <20080714195651.GF3445@muc.de> <487C5FA3.4070603@emf.net> <87zloggji9.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <878wvxxkn6.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87ej5oz4pb.fsf@saeurebad.de> <87vdyzxype.fsf@saeurebad.de> <871w1njq32.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87iquzxgtk.fsf@saeurebad.de> <4884CFEF.8040404@gmail.com> <87ej5nxew2.fsf@saeurebad.de> <4884DA4F.20203@gmail.com> <8763qzxcfd.fsf@saeurebad.de> <4884E551.3050304@gmail.com> <86fxq2j1af.fsf@timbral.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1216709272 24220 80.91.229.12 (22 Jul 2008 06:47:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 06:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Evans Winner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 22 08:48:41 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KLBfr-0006Mp-Ur for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:48:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33721 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KLBex-00051O-GV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:47:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KLBet-000510-IE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:47:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KLBeq-00050o-Li for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:47:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43506 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KLBeq-00050l-Hr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:47:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:33147) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KLBep-0001C2-Oe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:47:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-in-12.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.52]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KLBen-0004xF-8M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:47:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-in-11-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-11-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.28]) by mail-in-12.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B567B4C36F; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:47:28 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-in-05.arcor-online.net (mail-in-05.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.45]) by mail-in-11-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB4134727B; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:47:28 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from lola.goethe.zz (dslb-084-061-039-033.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.39.33]) by mail-in-05.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8771CB887; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:47:28 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 8D2941C1346B; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:47:27 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <86fxq2j1af.fsf@timbral.net> (Evans Winner's message of "Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:54:48 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.93.3/7775/Tue Jul 22 06:22:08 2008 on mail-in-05.arcor-online.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101167 Archived-At: Evans Winner writes: > "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" > writes: > > I presented (in this thread I believe) some of my > arguments about why to care about w32 too in my reply to > RMS about a portable mini-bash. I might be wrong, my > arguments might be bad, but I tried to give some > arguments. > > I don't know much about it, but isn't that what MinGW is > supposed to provide? Uh, "portable" is not the same as "runs on Windows". There are other platforms too, you know. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum