From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:04:08 +0200 Message-ID: <85prssjm1j.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <85lk3hotkw.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208200146 15485 80.91.229.12 (14 Apr 2008 19:09:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, handa@m17n.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 14 21:09:41 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlTzl-0007u1-NM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:05:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlTz7-0000zg-Ha for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:04:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlTyX-0000lF-Jg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:04:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlTyW-0000kL-2a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:04:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlTyV-0000kG-TT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:04:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-in-10.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.50]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JlTyQ-0004qI-JM; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:04:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-in-17-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-17-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.34]) by mail-in-10.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D94E22D334; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:04:12 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (mail-in-03.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.43]) by mail-in-17-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0062B45C902; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:04:12 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from lola.goethe.zz (dslb-084-061-061-208.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.61.208]) by mail-in-03.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9599630AC46; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:04:11 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 4EA681C452D3; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:04:08 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:54:46 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6766/Mon Apr 14 18:34:09 2008 on mail-in-03.arcor-online.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95203 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: David Kastrup >> Cc: Stefan Monnier , eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 08:10:07 +0200 >> >> How does recode-region work with encodings having a BOM? Probably the >> problem is not dissimilar to working with shift encodings. Still I have >> a hard time to picture either. > > I'm not following: what exactly puzzles you in this, and why > recode-region is an issue? Because it is not clear whether it should add or remove BOM marks (like visiting a file would). I've gone into more detail in a different mail to the list I think, so it might make sense replying there. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum