From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: allocate_string_data memory corruption
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:48:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85oe29gksj.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uk6cx6vj2.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:06:25 +0200")
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
>> Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:57:02 -0500
>>
>> /* no crash here */
>> if (data->string != s || data->nbytes != nbytes) abort ();
>>
>> check_sblock (current_sblock);
>>
>> /* crash occured here */
>> if (data->string != s || data->nbytes != nbytes) abort ();
>> ...
>> }
>>
>>
>> In this function, data->string is set to s, and nbytes is set to
>> nbytes. If check_sblock is a no-op, there should be no change.
>> However, we get an abort on the second debugging check:
>>
>> #0 abort () at emacs.c:461
>
> Are you in fact 110% sure the abort happens on the second debugging
> check? Can you tell how did you verify this? (The line number shown
> by GDB is not a reliable evidence.)
>
> Was this code compiled without optimizations? If not, recompile with
> "-O0" and see if you get abort or crash in another place.
In particular (from DEBUG):
** When you are trying to analyze failed assertions, it will be
essential to compile Emacs either completely without optimizations or
at least (when using GCC) with the -fno-crossjumping option. Failure
to do so may make the compiler recycle the same abort call for all
assertions in a given function, rendering the stack backtrace useless
for identifying the specific failed assertion.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-18 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-18 16:57 allocate_string_data memory corruption Chong Yidong
2006-01-18 20:48 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-20 0:45 ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-20 1:14 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-20 3:48 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-23 20:21 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-24 17:23 ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-18 21:35 ` Ken Raeburn
2006-01-18 23:56 ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-19 8:53 ` Romain Francoise
2006-01-19 20:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-19 22:48 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-01-20 3:46 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-20 22:58 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-25 3:26 ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-25 15:45 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-20 1:14 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-20 9:28 ` Ken Raeburn
2006-01-20 22:58 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-18 22:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-18 23:48 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2006-01-18 23:48 ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-19 1:15 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-19 3:21 ` Ken Raeburn
2006-01-19 4:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-20 1:14 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-20 3:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-20 14:49 ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-21 19:57 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-22 17:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-20 22:58 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-21 4:48 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-21 17:31 ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-22 3:57 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-22 16:45 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-22 20:06 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-01-23 0:10 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-23 0:35 ` Ken Raeburn
2006-01-23 1:58 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-23 2:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-24 16:46 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-23 0:55 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-24 16:46 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-24 17:57 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-01-24 18:33 ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-25 15:45 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-26 1:41 ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-26 17:46 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-26 18:40 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-26 19:45 ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-27 22:32 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-27 23:33 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-01-29 14:53 ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-29 4:58 ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-30 0:57 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-30 1:06 ` Chong Yidong
2006-01-27 22:32 ` Richard M. Stallman
2006-01-26 19:10 ` Chong Yidong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85oe29gksj.fsf@lola.goethe.zz \
--to=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.