From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Jenkner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7240: 24.0.50; [PATCH] backward-sentence sometimes overshoots (and breaks doctor) Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:03:00 +0200 Message-ID: <85mxdu11ij.fsf@iznogoud.viz> References: <85wrpfbg49.fsf@iznogoud.viz> <85k4b6hvpt.fsf@iznogoud.viz> <85sjnoe98z.fsf@iznogoud.viz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316873018 30759 80.91.229.12 (24 Sep 2011 14:03:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, 7240@debbugs.gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 24 16:03:34 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7SpK-0007TY-4u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:03:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39293 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7SpJ-0007mj-KH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:03:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47602) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7SpH-0007mc-1L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:03:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7SpG-0001u0-4h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:03:31 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:32829) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R7SpF-0001tw-Vd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:03:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7Spl-0008AG-Oq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:04:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Wolfgang Jenkner Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7240 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7240-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7240.131687302131355 (code B ref 7240); Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7240) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Sep 2011 14:03:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7SpR-00089g-2r for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:03:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mx16.lb01.inode.at ([62.99.145.18] helo=mx.inode.at) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7SpO-00089U-0J for 7240@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:03:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [85.127.94.229] (port=4377 helo=iznogoud.viz) by smartmx-16.inode.at with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R7Sop-0001mY-1W; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:03:03 +0200 Original-Received: from wolfgang by iznogoud.viz with local (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1R7Som-0000fI-W1; Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:03:01 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:28:19 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:04:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51779 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > Your patch would work correctly. The reason I wanted to do it > differently was to avoid finding the start of the paragraph twice. Thank you very much for the explanation (and sorry if I was a bit too blunt)! I note that both you and Alan seem to think that backward-paragraph is not always quite the right thing to use when moving backwards to ahem... a paragraph beginning :-) Wolfgang