Re: access to parser stack in SMIE

[Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@member.fsf.org>]

Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@member.fsf.org> writes:

> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>
>>> I'll still play with semantic; there are front-end tools like code
>>> completion and function call template that rely on it. But it's less
>>> urgent.
>>
>> Semantic support would be really neat, yes.
>> [ Hopefully, at some point SMIE and Semantic will get closer, to the
>>   point where a given language mode doesn't need to give 2 different
>>   specifications of the language.  ]
>
> You could write a translator from the bison BNF format to the current
> SMIE BNF format, that should not be too hard. 

I take this back; the SMIE grammar needs refined tokens, which the BNF
does not. Most of the work in building a SMIE indentation engine is
figuring out what tokens to refine, and how to refine them.

-- 
-- Stephe