From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lexbind Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:09:34 +0100 Message-ID: <85k5kjz9ox.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <857igj1myh.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204585819 3628 80.91.229.12 (3 Mar 2008 23:10:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 23:10:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 04 00:10:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JWJnk-0002ZS-8f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 00:10:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWJnD-0007Ue-26 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:09:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWJn5-0007Q1-S1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:09:51 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWJn1-0007KN-3z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:09:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWJn0-0007K7-WE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:09:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-in-02.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.42]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWJmt-0005h9-0v; Mon, 03 Mar 2008 18:09:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-in-16-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-16-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.33]) by mail-in-02.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED2B32E822; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 00:09:34 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from mail-in-06.arcor-online.net (mail-in-06.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.46]) by mail-in-16-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7CB2540A3; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 00:09:34 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from lola.goethe.zz (dslb-084-061-058-104.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.58.104]) by mail-in-06.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FA235E6A7; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 00:09:34 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 7D6821C1E254; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 00:09:34 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:43:42 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6097/Mon Mar 3 21:58:29 2008 on mail-in-06.arcor-online.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91254 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> I certainly would like to have a replacement for the ugly (and >> non-byte-compiled) > >> `(lambda (...) ... ',value ) > > You can already use `lexical-let' for that. In a certain sense, the > `lexbind' branch makes let-binding behave like lexical-let by default. It does not look pretty in the source. Are function parameters let or lexical-let to their values in lexbind? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum