From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Jenkner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs revision #107149 Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:00:43 +0100 Message-ID: <85ipjbv96s.fsf@iznogoud.viz> References: <20120210232039.GC4340@acm.acm> <87pqdlbby2.fsf@gnus.org> <20120211195927.GA3969@acm.acm> <87zkcnhjfw.fsf@gnus.org> <20120212222238.GA2810@acm.acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329094861 10702 80.91.229.3 (13 Feb 2012 01:01:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-cc-mode@gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 13 02:01:00 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RwkHs-0006SG-52 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:01:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54856 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RwkHr-0002II-Nb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:00:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49803) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RwkHo-0002Hu-Ec for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:00:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RwkHn-0005WM-Bk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:00:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mx19.lb01.inode.at ([62.99.145.21]:30238 helo=mx.inode.at) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RwkHl-0005Uw-LG; Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:00:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [85.127.18.164] (port=2814 helo=iznogoud.viz) by smartmx-19.inode.at with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RwkHc-0001LL-Ua; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:00:45 +0100 Original-Received: from wolfgang by iznogoud.viz with local (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1RwkHb-0000jG-Pm; Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:00:43 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: Alan Mackenzie , Lars Ingebrigtsen , bug-cc-mode@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20120212222238.GA2810@acm.acm> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:22:38 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.92 (berkeley-unix) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 62.99.145.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148531 Archived-At: On Sun, Feb 12 2012, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > But, do you actually have to suppress these support modes? They're there > to fontify text screens faster. Why disable them? Nowadays, with faster > HW than ever, it seems pointless even to bother. The buffer where the fontification happens is not displayed, instead its content is inserted in a buffer with a different major-mode, and in between emacs stays never idle for the font-lock support functions to kick in. Wolfgang