From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: region-active-p Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:56:06 +0100 Message-ID: <85hck5voi1.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193942392 4196 80.91.229.12 (1 Nov 2007 18:39:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 18:39:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc, andreas.roehler@online.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@jurta.org, Stefan Monnier , "Kim F. Storm" , stephen@xemacs.org, Miles Bader To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 01 19:39:53 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1InexM-0000YI-Ix for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 19:39:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1InexC-0005vR-GM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:39:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IneFq-0006Vh-6I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:54:54 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IneFo-0006RI-BY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:54:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IneFo-0006R0-7J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:54:52 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IneFn-0003V5-LG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:54:51 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IneFg-0008IP-5U; Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:54:44 -0400 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 9CE7B1C464E3; Thu, 1 Nov 2007 18:56:06 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Thu, 1 Nov 2007 08:46:15 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:38:52 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82304 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: >> >> Anyway, what I'm trying to say is that a name like `region-override-p' >> >> makes code harder to understand. >> > >> > For what it's worth, I agree 100%, >> >> FWIW, me too. > > FWIW, another. What about region-given-p or region-specified-p or region-selected-p? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum