From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Terrible underline Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:35:04 +0100 Message-ID: <85hcfj359z.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <47D011C0.6090801@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204844784 15773 80.91.229.12 (6 Mar 2008 23:06:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 23:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 07 00:06:51 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JXPA6-0001aw-9p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 00:06:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXP9Y-0005jq-Rl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:05:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXP9V-0005jP-Cx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:05:29 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXP9T-0005iI-5W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:05:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXP9S-0005hv-Vl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:05:27 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JXP9S-0007Yb-MI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:05:26 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JXP9R-0007MF-RF; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 18:05:26 -0500 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 5774C1C5682B; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 22:35:08 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <47D011C0.6090801@gmail.com> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Thu, 06 Mar 2008 16:46:08 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91560 Archived-At: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: > I get terrible underlines with CVS Emacs 23, see the attached > picture. I guess this has something to do with the new font handling, > or? They look fine to me. Have you looked at the screenshot? Maybe it captures the way things should look rather than how they actually do? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum