From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: utf-16le vs utf-16-le Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:35:23 +0200 Message-ID: <85hce2eu0k.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <87wsn1fl72.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87prssgacl.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <851w58q24a.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87lk3gfg40.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87fxtof8x1.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87wsmzdpsp.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208291939 21240 80.91.229.12 (15 Apr 2008 20:38:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 15 22:39:35 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JlrtA-0005aN-V5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:36:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlrsW-0006k5-A9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:35:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlrsR-0006jS-Bq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:35:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JlrsP-0006jC-KM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:35:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JlrsP-0006j3-DG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:35:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-in-07.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.47]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JlrsK-0004ex-LI; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:35:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-in-12-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-12-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.29]) by mail-in-07.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516FD24AE8B; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:35:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-in-16.arcor-online.net (mail-in-16.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.56]) by mail-in-12-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA5127944C; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:35:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from lola.goethe.zz (dslb-084-061-070-008.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.70.8]) by mail-in-16.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21890236E51; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:35:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id B028E1C452D2; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:35:23 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:31:40 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6783/Tue Apr 15 20:30:45 2008 on mail-in-16.arcor-online.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95311 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:09:32 +0300 >> From: Eli Zaretskii >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> Possible completions are: >> utf-8 utf-8-dos utf-8-emacs utf-8-emacs-dos >> utf-8-emacs-mac utf-8-emacs-unix utf-8-mac utf-8-unix > > Btw, utf-8-emacs is also an unfortunate name, IMO, because it again > does not explain in any way the difference between utf-8 and > utf-8-emacs. Since I'm already in Emacs, adding -emacs to an encoding > name adds no information that would help me resolve the ambiguity. > > How about emacs-internal instead? Or anything else with the word > ``internal'' as part of it? (The fact that it is based on UTF-8 is > IMO irrelevant: it's still an internal Emacs representation that is > understood only by Emacs.) unicode2-internal? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum