From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: offby1@blarg.net, lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se,
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
emacs-devel@gnu.org, "Kim F. Storm" <storm@cua.dk>
Subject: Re: [mange@freemail.hu: grep-tree doesn't shell-quote-argument]
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:28:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85d5fdhey2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874q0pk8xm.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:14:46 -0400")
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> I think that what Kim suggests (rename grep-find to
> grep-find-command, grep-tree to grep-find-template, and introduce a
> new grep-find which calls either of the two depending on nilness of
> current-arg-prefix) is the way to go. Much better than introducing
> a complex configuration and prefix-arg protocol to choose what to do
> when.
Strike the complexity. Use of a prefix arg to make it possible to
post-edit the command is, IMO, a good idea. Quite often one wants to
start a command that is almost, but not quite, like the default
recipe. Kim's suggestion to use an alias for configuration between
two separate commands is not customize-friendly. And it offers no
reasonable way to actually get both: prompting for the parts, and a
final opportunity for editing the resulting command before sending it
off.
I think the latter is important enough to offer this with a prefix
argument, and this can't be easily accomplished if there is no unified
command that can actually prompt for the parts as well as the finished
command.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-19 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-18 12:57 [mange@freemail.hu: grep-tree doesn't shell-quote-argument] Richard Stallman
2006-04-18 14:02 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-04-18 14:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-18 15:11 ` Eric Hanchrow
2006-04-18 15:18 ` Lennart Borgman
2006-04-19 8:59 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-04-19 9:15 ` Romain Francoise
2006-04-19 9:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-19 11:41 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-04-19 12:23 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-19 12:51 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-04-19 13:09 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-19 21:13 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-19 13:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-04-19 13:28 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2006-04-19 13:58 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-04-19 14:09 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-19 14:58 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-04-19 15:10 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-19 16:59 ` Kevin Rodgers
2006-04-19 17:08 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-19 14:52 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-04-19 15:03 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-19 18:10 ` Bill Wohler
2006-04-19 18:15 ` Drew Adams
2006-04-19 18:23 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-19 18:34 ` Bill Wohler
2006-04-19 21:13 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-19 12:49 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-04-18 15:27 ` Romain Francoise
2006-04-19 4:17 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-19 8:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-19 21:12 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-20 9:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-04-21 8:27 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-04-21 14:47 ` Magnus Henoch
2006-04-21 17:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-04-21 20:04 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-04-21 20:40 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-04-21 21:35 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-04-22 12:03 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-22 12:41 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-23 16:06 ` Bill Wohler
2006-04-23 16:19 ` Bill Wohler
2006-04-22 23:02 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-04-23 21:58 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-23 22:06 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-24 11:51 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-24 12:04 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-25 16:46 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-24 12:10 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-04-24 22:46 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-04-25 16:47 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-24 11:05 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-04-24 11:11 ` Miles Bader
2006-04-24 11:24 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-24 11:31 ` Miles Bader
2006-04-24 11:43 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-24 11:52 ` Miles Bader
2006-04-24 17:52 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-24 18:16 ` David Kastrup
2006-04-24 20:38 ` Chong Yidong
2006-04-25 16:48 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-26 8:27 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-04-27 4:36 ` Richard Stallman
2006-04-25 9:06 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-04-29 3:50 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85d5fdhey2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz \
--to=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se \
--cc=offby1@blarg.net \
--cc=storm@cua.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.