From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs Environment Variables Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:19:34 +0100 Message-ID: <85d4tys67t.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <7e3068b0-defa-4b37-9092-182b521f5f50@e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <3568102A-B060-4D1F-B7B5-7944386B07A9@Web.DE> <20071124124821.GA5409@ono.com> <87ir3qzw3m.fsf@lion.rapttech.com.au> <85fxyutxj3.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85k5o6sa3i.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1196004592 4810 80.91.229.12 (25 Nov 2007 15:29:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 15:29:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Peter Dyballa Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 25 16:29:59 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IwJQi-0007Qw-Cm for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:29:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IwJQT-0008MF-Hn for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:29:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IwJQA-0008Hg-CY for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:29:22 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IwJQ8-0008Fy-IB for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:29:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IwJQ8-0008Fr-Ay for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:29:20 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IwJQ7-00062I-VU for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:29:20 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IwJQ7-0004Lk-ML; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 10:29:19 -0500 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id A85EC1CCF7FE; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:19:34 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Peter Dyballa's message of "Sun, 25 Nov 2007 15:54:40 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:49509 Archived-At: Peter Dyballa writes: > Am 25.11.2007 um 14:55 schrieb David Kastrup: > >> "man csh" verifies that csh is still unsuitable for redirecting stdout >> and stderr to different locations. > > I am proud to report that I have experience in not boiling my eggs > with my hammer! > > How often do you need to separate stdout and stderr in some shell? Huh? dd if=something of=something 2>>logfile | tar xf - Stuff like that is completely common for scripting. Or even just echo "This is an error." >&2 You know, there is a reason that both stdout and stderr exist. > Maybe I have bad habits so that it does not happen that often to me > that I could remember. Maybe you just don't use csh for scripting. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum