From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 71655@debbugs.gnu.org, james@literate-devops.io
Subject: bug#71655: Eshell external commands do not work under GNU Emacs for Windows
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:55:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <858d2907-7ee4-da6f-cd9e-6b7bd3ba4c7e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86cyocnjkl.fsf@gnu.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1399 bytes --]
On 6/20/2024 12:45 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 22:34:02 -0700
>> Cc: 71655@debbugs.gnu.org, james@literate-devops.io
>> From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>
>>
>> My version of ls reports it as a symlink, interestingly enough.
>
> It isn't a symlink. It is a reparse point of type APPEXECLINK, which
> has different attributes and different data structure describing the
> target. We could represent it as a symlink (since Posix has no direct
> equivalent), but the implementation under the hood will need to be
> different.
Right. This was just (what I thought was) an interesting observation
about how other POSIX-based tools treat these reparse points.
> I agree that all those other conditions (including the .exe test) seem
> to be reasonable, in addition to zero-size.
Do you have a preference between either of these patches? They either
check for zero-size or ignore file errors when trying to insert.
I don't have a strong preference myself, but the latter seems
ever-so-slightly safer to me. This bug happened because we can't read
the file when trying to insert it, so ignoring file errors would cover
any other situations we haven't predicted. On the other hand, maybe
there's a case where we *want* the 'insert-file-contents-literally'
error to signal so that we don't try to execute the file normally (I
can't think of any such cases, though).
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Use-file-attribute-size.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1605 bytes --]
From 4521f82dcef0253564574012c571564111e06c4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:45:19 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fix execution of MS-Windows app execution aliases in Eshell
* lisp/eshell/esh-ext.el (eshell-script-interpreter): Check for 0-size
files.
---
lisp/eshell/esh-ext.el | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lisp/eshell/esh-ext.el b/lisp/eshell/esh-ext.el
index 3c4deb32601..cf93d2904da 100644
--- a/lisp/eshell/esh-ext.el
+++ b/lisp/eshell/esh-ext.el
@@ -301,7 +301,17 @@ eshell-script-interpreter
(INTERPRETER [ARGS] FILE)"
(let ((maxlen eshell-command-interpreter-max-length))
(if (and (file-readable-p file)
- (file-regular-p file))
+ (file-regular-p file)
+ ;; If the file is zero bytes, it can't possibly have a
+ ;; shebang. This check may seem redundant, but we can
+ ;; encounter files that Emacs considers both readable and
+ ;; regular, but which aren't *actually* readable. This can
+ ;; happen, for example, with certain kinds of reparse
+ ;; points like APPEXECLINK on NTFS filesystems (MS-Windows
+ ;; uses these for "app execution aliases"). In these
+ ;; cases, the file size is 0, so this check protects us
+ ;; from errors.
+ (> (file-attribute-size (file-attributes file)) 0))
(with-temp-buffer
(insert-file-contents-literally file nil 0 maxlen)
(if (looking-at "#![ \t]*\\([^ \r\t\n]+\\)\\([ \t]+\\(.+\\)\\)?")
--
2.25.1
[-- Attachment #3: 0001-Use-ignore-error.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2091 bytes --]
From 55cf3088d0075f7d453eecb1e03683de4444eb4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Porter <jporterbugs@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:41:25 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fix execution of MS-Windows app execution aliases in Eshell
* lisp/eshell/esh-ext.el (eshell-script-interpreter): Return nil if we
can't actually read the file.
---
lisp/eshell/esh-ext.el | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lisp/eshell/esh-ext.el b/lisp/eshell/esh-ext.el
index 3c4deb32601..6fb0579ed14 100644
--- a/lisp/eshell/esh-ext.el
+++ b/lisp/eshell/esh-ext.el
@@ -299,18 +299,23 @@ eshell-script-interpreter
Return nil, or a list of the form:
(INTERPRETER [ARGS] FILE)"
- (let ((maxlen eshell-command-interpreter-max-length))
- (if (and (file-readable-p file)
- (file-regular-p file))
- (with-temp-buffer
- (insert-file-contents-literally file nil 0 maxlen)
- (if (looking-at "#![ \t]*\\([^ \r\t\n]+\\)\\([ \t]+\\(.+\\)\\)?")
- (if (match-string 3)
- (list (match-string 1)
- (match-string 3)
- file)
- (list (match-string 1)
- file)))))))
+ (when (and (file-readable-p file)
+ (file-regular-p file))
+ (let ((maxlen eshell-command-interpreter-max-length))
+ ;; If we encounter a file error, assume that FILE doesn't have a
+ ;; shebang. This can happen, for example, with certain kinds of
+ ;; reparse points like APPEXECLINK on NTFS filesystems (MS-Windows
+ ;; uses these for "app execution aliases").
+ (ignore-error 'file-error
+ (with-temp-buffer
+ (insert-file-contents-literally file nil 0 maxlen)
+ (if (looking-at "#![ \t]*\\([^ \r\t\n]+\\)\\([ \t]+\\(.+\\)\\)?")
+ (if (match-string 3)
+ (list (match-string 1)
+ (match-string 3)
+ file)
+ (list (match-string 1)
+ file))))))))
(defun eshell-find-interpreter (file args &optional no-examine-p)
"Find the command interpreter with which to execute FILE.
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-22 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-19 15:53 bug#71655: Eshell external commands do not work under GNU Emacs for Windows James Hilling via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-06-19 19:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-06-19 19:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-06-19 19:40 ` Jim Porter
2024-06-20 4:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-06-20 5:34 ` Jim Porter
2024-06-20 7:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-06-22 19:55 ` Jim Porter [this message]
2024-06-23 4:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-06-24 1:40 ` Jim Porter
2024-06-24 5:56 ` Michael Albinus via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2024-07-08 3:26 ` Jim Porter
2024-07-08 11:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2024-06-19 19:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=858d2907-7ee4-da6f-cd9e-6b7bd3ba4c7e@gmail.com \
--to=jporterbugs@gmail.com \
--cc=71655@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=james@literate-devops.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.