From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: Small install patch for emacs leim 21.2 Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 14:09:38 +0300 Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <8582-Fri17May2002140938+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021633925 29416 127.0.0.1 (17 May 2002 11:12:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 11:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 178feX-0007eL-00 for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 13:12:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 178feu-0000Ni-00; Fri, 17 May 2002 07:12:28 -0400 Original-Received: from odin.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.10]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 178fe9-0000KX-00 for ; Fri, 17 May 2002 07:11:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Zaretsky ([80.230.2.40]) by odin.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.1.0.54-GA) with ESMTP id AEP20152; Fri, 17 May 2002 14:11:01 +0300 (IDT) Original-To: pere@hungry.com X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-Reply-To: (message from Petter Reinholdtsen on Wed, 15 May 2002 17:29:47 +0200) Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:1411 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:1411 > From: Petter Reinholdtsen > Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 17:29:47 +0200 > > I reported this bug for the emacs package for version 21.1, and it was > fixed in emacs 21.2. Then, I did not check the other emacs-related > packages. Thanks, it is fixed for the next release. > It might be a good idea to check these (elisp-manual comes > to mind :-), to see if the problem is present there as well. Elisp manual's Makefile doesn't use `tar' in its `install' target.