From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] 01/02: update to Ada mode version 5.0.1 Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 09:09:32 -0600 Message-ID: <857g9c44ib.fsf@stephe-leake.org> References: <20140202214846.27558.28754@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391440186 10259 80.91.229.3 (3 Feb 2014 15:09:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:09:46 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 03 16:09:53 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WAL9l-00037f-2H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:09:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47857 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAL9k-0005fk-Jj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:09:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56483) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAL9a-0005T4-TK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:09:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAL9U-0002ba-VO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:09:42 -0500 Original-Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.225]:8249 helo=cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WAL9U-0002bT-RL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 10:09:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [75.87.81.6] ([75.87.81.6:49784] helo=TAKVER) by cdptpa-oedge03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id BD/AC-05632-F21BFE25; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 15:09:36 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 02 Feb 2014 21:36:38 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (windows-nt) X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.142:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: BaiduSpider X-Received-From: 107.14.166.225 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169367 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> new Ada mode keybinding: C-c ; comment-dwim > > Why? It's already available globally on M-; since Emacs-21 or so! For compatibility with Ada mode 4.0.1, which had a similar binding; this was specifically requested by an alpha-tester. I did forget that M-; was not my local binding. We could have dropped the Ada mode C-c ; binding at any time in the last decade, but I only learned about comment-dwim recently. Is there some style guideline for issues like this? Is there a way to mark a key binding obsolete/deprecated? -- -- Stephe