From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: byte compiler warnings when bootstrapping Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:15:06 +0200 Message-ID: <856410a1h1.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <200710210738.l9L7cIGs012673@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200710211558.l9LFwIBv003882@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1192990754 28843 80.91.229.12 (21 Oct 2007 18:19:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:19:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 21 20:19:14 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IjfOL-0001s9-Hi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:19:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjfOD-0000Qf-Nv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:19:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IjfKO-0003Vu-Lb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:15:08 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IjfKM-0003TY-R5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:15:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjfKM-0003Sy-IE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:15:06 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IjfKL-0006jJ-HV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:15:05 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IjdRJ-0002QW-RP; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:14:10 -0400 Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 6CF451C4D4B3; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:15:06 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <200710211558.l9LFwIBv003882@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Sun\, 21 Oct 2007 08\:58\:18 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:81383 Archived-At: Dan Nicolaescu writes: > Stefan Monnier writes: > > > > With that and with adding a few more (eval-when-compile (require 'blah)) > > > > What is the use of (eval-when-compile (require 'blah)) in this context? > > I expect it's the wrong solution. > > When the number of warnings for undefined functions is too high it > might be better to just require the package that defines them. But you > might be right... But how do the functions actually get defined at runtime? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum