From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CVS HEAD fails to build on OSX 10.4 (macterm.c broken?) Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:07:44 +0200 Message-ID: <854pibklov.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <86k5re4blv.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <86fy224aah.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <86bqcq4a4q.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <200708291604.l7TG4atk011108@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <867ine492x.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <863ay24826.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <200708291641.l7TGfo2t012413@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200708310812.l7V8Cgq9022040@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <86lkbnygii.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1188886085 31721 80.91.229.12 (4 Sep 2007 06:08:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 06:08:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: merlyn@stonehenge.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 04 08:08:04 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ISRZw-0004gc-Cy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:08:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISRZu-0003LZ-Qz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 02:07:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISRZr-0003LO-QY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 02:07:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISRZp-0003Ky-7w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 02:07:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISRZp-0003Kv-1d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 02:07:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-in-05.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.45]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ISRZk-0006zF-Ql; Tue, 04 Sep 2007 02:07:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-in-11-z2.arcor-online.net (mail-in-11-z2.arcor-online.net [151.189.8.28]) by mail-in-05.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E291836CC; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 08:07:47 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from mail-in-06.arcor-online.net (mail-in-06.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.46]) by mail-in-11-z2.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74581345BE8; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 08:07:47 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from lola.goethe.zz (dslb-084-061-020-113.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.61.20.113]) by mail-in-06.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBF735E718; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 08:07:47 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by lola.goethe.zz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id F24971C0039C; Tue, 4 Sep 2007 08:07:44 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon\, 03 Sep 2007 20\:57\:21 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/4142/Tue Sep 4 05:26:06 2007 on mail-in-06.arcor-online.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77722 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > At first go, would it be better to have > UNICODE in the HEAD and get the multi-tty branch up to the HEAD level > (with UNICODE) and finally bring it in to the main stream. > > That would be a lot of backtracking, and it doesn't make sense. > > What we need to do now is merge the multi-tty changes into the > Unicode-2 branch, then install the Unicode-2 changes into the trunk. In my opinion, what we need to do now is cleaning up multi-tty until people are comfortable with it. No sense in merging until that is the case, is it? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum