From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ulf Jasper Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5549: 23.1; icalender-export-region fails to recognize times like 0:30 Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:16:02 +0100 Message-ID: <84y6izoa6l.fsf@web.de> References: <87hbprnt7s.fsf@kallisto.karme.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1265916220 5027 80.91.229.12 (11 Feb 2010 19:23:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: karme , 5549@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 11 20:23:28 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NfedL-0005W2-81 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:23:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43340 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NfedE-0003hW-Jp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:23:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NfecW-0003NG-69 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:22:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42135 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NfecT-0003M4-DY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:22:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NfecS-0005gy-57 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:22:33 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41057) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NfecR-0005gs-Nj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:22:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NfeX7-0001m4-TP; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:17:01 -0500 X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ulf Jasper Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 5549 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5549-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5549.12659157976805 (code B ref 5549); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5549) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2010 19:16:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NfeWj-0001li-FD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:16:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.181]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NfeWh-0001ld-OQ for 5549@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:16:36 -0500 X-RZG-AUTH: :OWACVUW4a/MW23Dy3JvWYzB9ib5hHLJRJ2XqtRyYWgVkgkqLLeiGkYQYTyZ2/RHy X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Original-Received: from ubuntulf (p54B0D8CA.dip.t-dialin.net [84.176.216.202]) by post.strato.de (klopstock mo7) (RZmta 22.6) with ESMTP id 6034ecm1BJDcbO ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:16:03 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:32:08 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:17:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:35041 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > Why not just [0-9][0-9]?:[0-9][0-9] ? That's probably what I had in mind. I'll fix it the next days. Ulf