From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mohamed Hibti Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22786: 25.1.50; eww arabic rendering Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:18:40 +0100 Message-ID: <84y4aa3rb3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <84fuwjca8b.fsf@gmail.com> <8760xeq5kj.fsf@gnus.org> <84y4aaza45.fsf@gmail.com> <83y4aaggci.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456338023 18363 80.91.229.3 (24 Feb 2016 18:20:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:20:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, mohamed.hibti@gmail.com, 22786@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 24 19:20:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aYe2l-0004kp-9n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 19:20:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37573 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYe2k-00008m-Nv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:20:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52319) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYe2g-00006N-0q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:20:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYe2c-00083A-SL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:20:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47013) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYe2c-000835-PQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:20:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYe2c-0002oC-Jc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:20:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mohamed Hibti Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22786 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22786-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22786.145633794110702 (code B ref 22786); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22786) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2016 18:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44139 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYe1d-0002mO-HF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:19:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:35506) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aYe1c-0002m5-EF for 22786@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:19:00 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id c200so283104080wme.0 for <22786@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:19:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=R7RBTeDeaLqfvSvXw8AJo/qLbKUULIbmMYDp5VsPGbo=; b=Ywx+ISYo5k/GHLp2Nu/OeBjsGcMx9pbMb/ytRO5aZ3k81VBTer5jsJKY5hOS8t2/iJ IGFqCq4TNzH4oQr6q6SNHPk+j8s826I0qwXBfgs19C5/7gi3Eagw8sL9Xm8agc+VxR8D yy+yOTWehLZjM8512i0EBjV6+iR1S8Uljg40XxGHbT+AR9AjtWROjEIgkbxLwv0RZck1 f21u4PD1hcCQYNIu00sGmo0zis+4y6LnaaKMLdug6Q2Ispk+brSazRZpvpdHLSquYtC1 tXQF8Q5C2tBar2wse8jhMbSAOVZzeGf8s4TmG/nO01ysVThRBa5EL+lP0GwF4KTGDTeb MA7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=R7RBTeDeaLqfvSvXw8AJo/qLbKUULIbmMYDp5VsPGbo=; b=G6WDa2gecNZyxfXDzLTqew5W8DjpI22d4BG0FCRHSkrSh3zLDL5vyVr89ZWkv/FMv5 tVEhEB2Ug6xsT+3S+sZ9rLhgcDsoWWWDwbih3zPJipAihYdoA5fgjc/OXTSNULRmrr04 f8ch1gQqnE1t0wr71lL7zwzeCUaQ3q53xaLrTrlNluboSwuR6kfFPCMH6N5mzANppxl5 qbYBz3nb43RXaaJPxsYcUxwpCJihw1RYp4dLSVbVSr7ZAVcGpdPg1heQr3fVG6KP9NNa 1T+0hAQbcMoUEKOOi5F0Vu/J5h8uiqhN3RKAX2DLJGt3+OCV7KP67x/QkMUSB4f78TNe UYUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQSfaq1j1dvEA0l+CfWzWYC6IIb9+r2Pu8ZJYV7KEcDVu2456b0rdjDQpy1CS0oXA== X-Received: by 10.28.135.4 with SMTP id j4mr26529579wmd.80.1456337934731; Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:18:54 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from cassiopee ([2a01:e35:2ed6:4f40:2dfb:7da6:e129:6035]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w17sm4627588wmw.5.2016.02.24.10.18.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Feb 2016 10:18:53 -0800 (PST) User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 25.1.50.1 In-reply-to: <83y4aaggci.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113734 Archived-At: Thanks Eli for this reply ! Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Mohamed Hibti >> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 11:16:42 +0100 >> Cc: , 22786@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> >> There is a problem with the arabic composition (the letters are not >> >> displayed isolated and not assembled in a word). >> > >> > Do you have an example HTML file that displays this problem? >> >> Any arabic website I have tried for instance http://www.aljazeera.net. >> you can see the rendering in the attached png. > > It doesn't happen for me, with that page, either in Emacs 25.1.50 or > 25.0.91. The Arabic shaping does work for me. > > Do you have the same problem with the Arabic text in the buffer > created by "C-h H"? C-h H works well. In non html buffers, it works too. > > The screenshot you attached indicates that complex script display is > not working for some reason. Since your Emacs is built with libotf > and libm17n, the problem might be in old versions of these, so perhaps > rebuild with newer ones? Or maybe try a different font? I will try your suggestions.