From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BUG: indenting lisp code marks buffer as dirty when it shouldn't Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 16:08:16 +0100 Organization: University of Dortmund, Germany Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <84r8dbypi7.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de> References: <15840.45513.721157.204137@quack.quarl.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1038150907 23457 80.91.224.249 (24 Nov 2002 15:15:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 15:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18FyTS-00066D-00 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 16:15:06 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18FyYe-0000IV-00 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 16:20:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18FyP0-0007k6-00; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 10:10:30 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 18FyOK-0007HE-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 10:09:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 18FyOE-0007BZ-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 10:09:45 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18FyMu-0006qX-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 10:08:20 -0500 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18FyKu-0005ps-00 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 16:06:16 +0100 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18FyKt-0005pi-00 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2002 16:06:15 +0100 Original-Path: not-for-mail Original-Lines: 14 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: p50877e92.dip.t-dialin.net Original-X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1038150375 22189 80.135.126.146 (24 Nov 2002 15:06:15 GMT) Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 15:06:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Cancel-Lock: sha1:W98n/2GMQbYLHnsXbLgIMROqjMs= Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:9645 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:9645 Karl Chen writes: > The buffer is not modified. Thus the two `buffer-modified-tick's should > report the same value, but they don't. another way to test this is to save the > buffer before `indent-region', and see that `indent-region' makes the buffer > dirty, even though it ahsn't actually changed. M-q has the same problem, but is it really _that_ important? It took me 7 years of using Emacs to notice the M-q problem... kai -- ~/.signature is: umop ap!sdn (Frank Nobis)