From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: kai.grossjohann@gmx.net (=?iso-8859-1?q?Kai_Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Will default key bindings spell the death of Emacs? Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 15:26:41 +0200 Organization: University of Duisburg, Germany Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <84k7c84lbi.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> References: <3ED67422.7060305@math.ku.dk> <20030529214728.GA24984@gnu.org> <200305300010.h4U0AiNY018227@rum.cs.yale.edu> <3ED70531.4020504@math.ku.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1054302230 10097 80.91.224.249 (30 May 2003 13:43:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 13:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri May 30 15:43:48 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19Lk78-0002U6-00 for ; Fri, 30 May 2003 15:40:10 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19LkMI-0005Dj-00 for ; Fri, 30 May 2003 15:55:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Lk77-0002ms-08 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 30 May 2003 09:40:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19Ljzd-0007Zb-RL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2003 09:32:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19LjxB-0006nl-N7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2003 09:29:59 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19LjuX-000508-Ki for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2003 09:27:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19LjsP-0001Ke-00 for ; Fri, 30 May 2003 15:24:57 +0200 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19LjsN-0001KM-00 for ; Fri, 30 May 2003 15:24:55 +0200 Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Vs3bgq7adQe5isBSF5laWhpg5J4= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:14488 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:14488 Lars Hansen writes: > Yes, that quite much my problem. And I do use key-translation-map > to swap keys as you suggest. But I feel that is a workaround rather > than a real solution. Messages from Emacs then become wrong when > they refer to those key bindings. That seems to be a bug in Emacs. The messages can be changed to always display the right bindings. Please report those places. -- This line is not blank.