From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marco Wahl Subject: Re: editing scheme fragments Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 23:33:24 +0100 Message-ID: <84fukyh2vf.fsf@gmail.com> References: <84shoy9axv.fsf@gmail.com> <87tw9epuc3.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54004) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cOu7p-00086u-P2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 17:33:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cOu7l-00014f-Sa for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 17:33:41 -0500 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=41723 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cOu7l-00014I-MD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 17:33:37 -0500 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cOu7b-00010S-68 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 23:33:27 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Roger Mason writes: > Hello Nick, > > Nick Dokos writes: > >> Try with a minimal init file, avoiding all your customizations (other than loadin >> org and enabling scheme): >> >> emacs -q -l /path/to/minimal/init/file >> >> Does it still fail? > > Yes, but in trying this out I discovered that the keybinding I read as > "C-c `" (i.e. backtick) should be "C-c '" (i.e. apostrophe). When I use > the correct keybinding it works as advertised. Gosh. Haha. > I apologise for wasting the time of those who read my post and offered > their suggestions. Maybe I'm just too old and stunned and in need of > new spectacles. You showed at least one reader the C-c ` binding. How could this be a waste of time? AFAICS the C-c ` binding is only useful on tables. I think I will add a respective check to help avoid confusion with C-c '. Best regards