From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jim Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62556: 29.0.60; [PATCH] Fix regression when calling 'eshell-command' with a pipeline in the background Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 13:09:24 -0700 Message-ID: <84b09e1c-7670-0f4d-fb26-ed33010214e5@gmail.com> References: <2bb74356-66ec-d417-5732-e1e18b3df1e3@gmail.com> <83tty13040.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7472"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 62556@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 31 22:10:37 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1piL53-0001pB-HJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 22:10:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piL4Y-0003Ku-7D; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 16:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piL4V-0003KZ-OG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 16:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1piL4U-000887-KM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 16:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1piL4U-0007BH-0s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 16:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Jim Porter Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2023 20:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62556 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 62556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62556.168029337427564 (code B ref 62556); Fri, 31 Mar 2023 20:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2023 20:09:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34611 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1piL42-0007AV-GL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 16:09:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:43829) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1piL3z-0007AG-VL for 62556@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 16:09:32 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-f172.google.com with SMTP id kc4so22316980plb.10 for <62556@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 13:09:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1680293366; x=1682885366; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zLhOkkgVmJiLwLMXQowfZTKdQfNceHDjroiMVxTU0eU=; b=DbNSTMYTbW6PkgK0QMNTAA/tnWSIB7iSfV6z25EQRaTZXN+nWsdw9IZbBhA4NrXWmM +iB4qTqlc7lftmVzfScK/UZkcGGscFHxQ+6riFN04Ium225oYw72dbN6Fd3FbSD70MS/ G7M9Yhmy29/yxsgVXnDVmprLxvIZqoUxd6B+STnYTJNuWcBOgdAW7cUpGgPbwJbTTyYH PYeYnYmzd8KaP8De2/4B/zDKvqs3t4KKrxWCYzz9oNxzDIK0ELRD8hnoBFAP9cXZxw0z 5xvo/6RB8jvUKZhVW0GKC8kzRSZb9H7vqWe9R4JcFS4iV8uiOtDMkxP18NsQTAtPRmt8 0E+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1680293366; x=1682885366; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zLhOkkgVmJiLwLMXQowfZTKdQfNceHDjroiMVxTU0eU=; b=KOqL9vqfgNNI543J2Usxr+0d8EKX/ysiDAD1cvwqSHrN/XFP0W7gt2RiBYskHTiotX bCHREtObAf2zzPxJ3OhbQhod+pDHdyz4Yjt9L6wohyFuRYvMrvUglzZwM2YWW49LUA/m 0nnrciFTAb9WRQFDfFGozadOT3z6pmseQi8bd/Dnip5LS2lc1liTt6YzId5iviHPuxhv R/CYz15l1c2S2fR19J0qiZJE8v/HsHDOoqUK7AnL07dz3IQhJL6mS5G6ZRCJnr47IcyB Waxchjvgsrv1XEmbhbeqWq4U3Ef4VONvXDxWUGqOIHdtXfAIr4Now5IsoKffou2kSYdH UsSg== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9eZV/wJc76rd3WCSlColgjtC2ZUN8rWoE04U7PZ2M0zdJSW85dD BzcY4E9ke0K9hCZai/XTVXcv6wzDSI0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350aGVltsniI8dkMqRDEpPBSTG1vZD4Fmv1ZR0DxwzUCrS2m7WRBVQ/QesiWSv/3lE6OrAp+PWg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1647:b0:240:afb6:b07f with SMTP id il7-20020a17090b164700b00240afb6b07fmr12136902pjb.1.1680293365815; Fri, 31 Mar 2023 13:09:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (cpe-76-168-148-233.socal.res.rr.com. [76.168.148.233]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id w9-20020a170902a70900b001a060007fcbsm1927875plq.213.2023.03.31.13.09.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 31 Mar 2023 13:09:25 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <83tty13040.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259014 Archived-At: On 3/30/2023 11:29 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 21:18:10 -0700 >> From: Jim Porter >> >> This is a regression from my fix for bug#53715, which changed how >> Eshell pipelines return the processes in the pipeline. Attached are some >> patches to fix it. One for the emacs-29 branch, and one for master. > > Looks like there are _two_ patches for master, not one? Yeah, sorry. That was clumsy wording on my part. >> Eli, is it ok to merge the patch for emacs-29? > > Yes, thanks. Thanks. Merged to emacs-29 as 6419d78fa6f. I'll wait a couple days before merging the patches for master in case anyone else has comments, since they're a bit more substantial.