From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57752: 28.1.91; emacsclient-mail.desktop doesn't work for me Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 16:42:37 +0000 Message-ID: <84acc36e7e2d900b70c0@heytings.org> References: <87r10gcum8.fsf@cassou.me> <87bkrj31r0.fsf@gnus.org> <87y1unxv15.fsf@cassou.me> <83leqn4cji.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8prxtox.fsf@cassou.me> <878rmjy78x.fsf@gnus.org> <87bkrfiqbg.fsf@gmail.com> <878rmjqysp.fsf@cassou.me> <84acc36e7e9328ef2f76@heytings.org> <87zgezpebo.fsf@cassou.me> <84acc36e7e47f3fe9562@heytings.org> <7069638a-21b3-9777-215c-3ce4ec18ca37@froglet.home.mavit.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36413"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Jim Porter , Damien Cassou , Robert Pluim , 57752@debbugs.gnu.org, git@mavit.org.uk, Eli Zaretskii , Lars Ingebrigtsen To: Peter Oliver Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 16 18:44:03 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oZERf-0009D5-7a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 18:44:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39460 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZERc-00077l-Si for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:44:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37108) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZEQg-00077N-AT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:43:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44973) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZEQg-0002zt-1m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oZEQf-0004MI-TW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:43:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gregory Heytings Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 16:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57752 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57752-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57752.166334656116719 (code B ref 57752); Fri, 16 Sep 2022 16:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Sep 2022 16:42:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44049 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oZEQK-0004Lb-Tr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:42:41 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:44702) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oZEQI-0004LR-RD for 57752@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:42:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20220101; t=1663346557; bh=SWxm2HRRD0TxPI9o92gT8PsiMMSg7a+KX/U+H/zwvLY=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=aN0Md6A3xBBFp3zzpSV4Y8pYo1Y2+Ce0iMT+3mwwaZg5oaYb/9/afc8eI6NB2NEie yM0aW2+KzpnhjjhCVCcnXw+vKRqjKCOcCMMYaM27xc5mVqDTFz3Sg1CAGIVpO1+FjW LCOjKMxJXJ0zOwluUdce2alX3+YqUUEyfMK11qgx4mel2jvYA9IzXsaB1+1E+MMHfZ 4bNOn57JsNqW5k18NpVJre2aGn1U9KxI2upza2WhSaUuPnvdA4lDmbqdF596VxmRME RloFafrMzunEMnwgj6KhkDVpPz7TAjV9YA9I4rmEfRgcPnRPT4KFBH/QMrPQtKgLig T56UWzzVb1Drw== In-Reply-To: <7069638a-21b3-9777-215c-3ce4ec18ca37@froglet.home.mavit.org.uk> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:242788 Archived-At: >> And why is the above easier / better than >> >> emacsclient --eval '(progn (fun1 arg1 arg2) (fun2 arg3))' > > Because, with this, you have to correctly format the arguments with > appropriate quoting into a lisp program, rather than just passing them > straight in. If the arguments are input from something else, this is > harder than it appears. Bad quoting is a common source of bugs (things > like SQL injection, for example). > If that's the intended use case, IMO instead of adding two --function and --function-arg arguments it would be much clearer to add a --setq parameter: emacsclient --setq arg1 ... --setq arg2 ... --setq arg3 ... --eval '(progn (fun1 arg1 arg2) (fun2 arg3))'