From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New space char syntax Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 18:51:36 +0100 Organization: University of Duisburg, Germany Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <843cmpv3dj.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> References: <20030214183145.66AF.LEKTU@terra.es> <8465rm7g6d.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <20030215005635.C288.LEKTU@terra.es> <5xk7g15vym.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045331616 4314 80.91.224.249 (15 Feb 2003 17:53:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 17:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18k6VL-00017R-00 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 18:53:35 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18k6is-0000XY-00 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 19:07:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18k6Wu-0001Ag-03 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 12:55:12 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18k6WM-0000ul-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 12:54:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18k6UG-0006TE-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 12:52:31 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18k6UA-0006PV-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 12:52:22 -0500 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18k6Rr-0000zX-00 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 18:49:59 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from news by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18k6Rq-0000zO-00 for ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 18:49:58 +0100 Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) Emacs/21.3.50 Cancel-Lock: sha1:Gqvnx+t4o1B9jgM8kEigxOX5x4o= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11669 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11669 storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > Juanma Barranquero writes: > >> On Fri, 14 Feb 2003 21:36:42 +0100 >> kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann) wrote: >> >> > Difficult to say. I just changed all of them. But maybe I should go >> > back and just change things like (? ?a). >> >> I think so. It shouldn't be necessary to make any incompatible changes, >> just fixing broken usages, like "? ?a" to "? ?a", "?C-g" to "?\C-g", >> things like that. > > Please note that '(? ?a) is still valid syntax. Somebody else made a change in one spot in Gnus, and now it seems to compile. So it was just me being over-eager to change stuff. -- A turnip curses Elvis