From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: idn.el and confusables.txt Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 05:53:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83zklbvqrd.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308624860 29206 80.91.229.12 (21 Jun 2011 02:54:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 21 04:54:16 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QYr6W-00069b-8R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 04:54:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58779 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QYr6V-0002AG-J2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:54:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51507) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QYr6H-00029s-Cv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QYr6F-0001mQ-LY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:54:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:54556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QYr6F-0001mG-C8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2011 22:53:59 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LN400G00D2ABR00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 05:53:58 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.66.211]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LN400GYUDDW2P60@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 21 Jun 2011 05:53:58 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140752 Archived-At: > From: Kenichi Handa > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 11:07:02 +0900 > > By the way, as I got an idea of making the normal > CHAR_TABLE_REF macro usable for getting an element of such > table, please wait until I implement it. Thanks, will do. > > And what is the entry in that table for characters that don't have a > > mirrored character defined by BidiMirroring.txt? Is it the character > > itself or nil? > > It's nil. We can make it the character itself, but that > makes the uni-mirroring.el file big. Currently, the size is > just 3605 bytes (half of bidimirror.h). nil is fine, it's what bidi.c expects. > > Also, uni-mirroring.el will clash with uni-mirrorred.el on 8+3 > > filesystems. Can't we use the same uni-mirrorred.el file for both > > tables? > > If it is agreed to break the backward compatibility, I'll do > that. At the moment, at least in Emacs code, > uni-mirrorred.el is not used. I'm not sure what backward compatibility this would break. Adding another table to a file hardly breaks something, can it?