From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9875: 24.0.90; Confusing description of the "window tree" in ELisp manual Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:31:39 +0200 Message-ID: <83zkgnbo50.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319653950 4512 80.91.229.12 (26 Oct 2011 18:32:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:32:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9875@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 26 20:32:25 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ8H3-0001FM-IU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:32:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40855 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ8H3-0007fw-2c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:32:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ8Gy-0007be-5l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:32:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ8Gw-0000k2-UB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:32:20 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ8Gw-0000js-SY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:32:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ8Ic-0002Qu-Mm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9875 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9875-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9875.13196540269323 (code B ref 9875); Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9875) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Oct 2011 18:33:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ8IM-0002QK-ID for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:33:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RJ8IL-0002Q7-CA for 9875@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:33:45 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LTO00F00RECU500@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 9875@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:31:32 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.212.197]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LTO00F1ORGJSE20@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 26 Oct 2011 20:31:32 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 14:34:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53167 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: 9875@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:17:18 -0400 > > I think the first step is to choose a single name for those, and then > use it systematically. I think we should simply call "window" the > traditional "real" "live" "leaf" windows that display a buffer. As for > the other ones, we could go for "internal window", but I think "parent > window" is better, tho maybe someone has a better idea ("compound > window", "super window", ... ?) How about "window tree node" or just "node"? That's what they are, right?