From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10164: 24.0.91; Instant crash enabling linum-mode Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:29:27 +0200 Message-ID: <83zkfd4g6w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4ED58F60.4000604@code-affinity.com> <83bort60k0.fsf@gnu.org> <8762i13766.fsf@gnu.org> <838vmx5z28.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1322677866 20851 80.91.229.12 (30 Nov 2011 18:31:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10164@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 30 19:31:02 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RVovt-00006C-NY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:31:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37577 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVovt-00059v-AM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:31:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39180) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVovq-00059o-Jc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:30:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVovp-0003zO-Rw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:30:58 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46236) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RVovp-0003zJ-Lm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:30:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RVovt-0006cq-GM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:31:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10164 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10164-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10164.132267784325444 (code B ref 10164); Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10164) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Nov 2011 18:30:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RVovb-0006cL-Lh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:30:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RVovZ-0006cD-1U for 10164@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:30:42 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LVH00F00KOVGZ00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 10164@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:30:35 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.234.164]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LVH00FHVKQYD370@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:30:35 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:31:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:54509 Archived-At: > From: Dan Nicolaescu > Cc: eliz@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:10:47 -0500 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I'm amazed that this assertion didn't trigger until now. I guess too > > few people compile with asserts. > > You might want to add another option: > configure --enable-checking=xasserts > > to enable asserts, it's easier to enable checks when one does not have > to edit files. I thought that's what "configure --enable-asserts" did. Doesn't it? Or is that option inconvenient in some way?