From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Setting bidi-paragraph-direction in comint modes Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:01:23 +0200 Message-ID: <83zkckwxrg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87vcn9zzuf.fsf@gnu.org> <83d39hxptw.fsf@gnu.org> <87haysgbu9.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1329278490 1529 80.91.229.3 (15 Feb 2012 04:01:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 15 05:01:29 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RxW3b-0001se-Qp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:01:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48905 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxW3b-0003gA-D0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:01:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33075) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxW3Y-0003fa-O3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:01:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxW3X-0008J1-QI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:01:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:54239) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RxW3W-0008IV-Bo; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:01:22 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LZF00H001P4O200@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:01:19 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.150.51]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LZF00HRC1U6KS60@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:01:19 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87haysgbu9.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148620 Archived-At: > From: Chong Yidong > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:49:18 +0800 > > Like I said, it's simply `ls /usr/share/doc'. You mean, the insertion of the next chunk of text that arrives from `ls'? > You say that there is "some minor slowdown": that's the same slowdown > I'm referring to, I think. On my machine, the performance difference > with and without bidi-paragraph-direction is extremely noticeable. Can you quantify it? Like, how much time it takes to insert the first 2000 lines vs the last? I didn't look at the insertion itself, I tried the various cursor motion commands _after_ the output from `ls' was already in the buffer. Do you see the "crawl" there as well?