From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11566: 24.0.97; `read-from-minibuffer': focus to standalone minibuffer frame? Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 19:46:56 +0300 Message-ID: <83zk8r0wan.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6A40227DCFBF427491B710A473E45744@us.oracle.com> <4FC22A8D.6040801@gmx.at> <8D43F91B0096402A9BCA59FE13513358@us.oracle.com> <4FC49A24.7000403@gmx.at> <83aa0r2dy8.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1338310069 30797 80.91.229.3 (29 May 2012 16:47:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 16:47:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11566@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 29 18:47:47 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SZPaE-0002zJ-KX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 18:47:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43340 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZPaE-0006So-FB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 12:47:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36879) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZPaB-0006SG-8l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 12:47:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZPa6-0008Q8-Fs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 12:47:42 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39119) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SZPa6-0008Pq-Cr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 12:47:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SZPbR-0000ru-U8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 12:49:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 16:49:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11566 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11566-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11566.13383101013289 (code B ref 11566); Tue, 29 May 2012 16:49:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11566) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 May 2012 16:48:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48664 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SZPan-0000r0-28 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 12:48:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:44914) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SZPal-0000qn-1d for 11566@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 12:48:19 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M4S00300MJ76C00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 11566@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2012 19:46:49 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M4S0032EMM12O40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 29 May 2012 19:46:49 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:60472 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Cc: <11566@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 09:10:12 -0700 > > > Careful with your terminology: at least on MS-Windows, a "foreground" > > frame is the frame that has focus and receives input. So what you say > > cannot happen by definition. > > Got it. I too was using "foreground" to mean the topmost (highest in the > stacking order), and not the frame that receives keyboard input. Well, it's tricky terminology to be sure. > > The problem in bug #11513 was that a frame that was already a > > foreground frame was not raised. Maybe something similar happens > > here. > > Dunno. I don't have a lot of hope that it's related. But who knows? One can hope. However, in the interests of clarity, could you please describe the bug again, in terms of which frame has focus (i.e. is the "foreground" window), which is at the top of Z-order, and which has its border highlighted, after read-from-minibuffer is called, as you described in your original report?