From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12419: Mouse click changes layout Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:56:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83zk4stuf1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <504FB55D.5030405@t-online.de> <5050432C.4060203@gmx.at> <5052450F.8030001@t-online.de> <5052F242.4060303@gmx.at> <83a9wsvqk6.fsf@gnu.org> <50533344.2030000@gmx.at> <831ui4veny.fsf@gnu.org> <50534A48.5080805@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347641829 23610 80.91.229.3 (14 Sep 2012 16:57:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:57:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: occitan@esperanto.org, 12419@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 14 18:57:12 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TCZCa-0003Qh-6U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:57:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52808 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCZCW-0007QV-F5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:57:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56915) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCZCT-0007QF-Qi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:57:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCZCS-0006Xo-F4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:57:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52755) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TCZCS-0006Xi-1L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:57:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TCZDN-0006az-UM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:58:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12419 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12419-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12419.134764184225303 (code B ref 12419); Fri, 14 Sep 2012 16:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12419) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Sep 2012 16:57:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34068 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TCZCk-0006a4-I3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:57:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:52384) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TCZCh-0006Zu-2B for 12419@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 12:57:20 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MAC00D00MCUW400@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 12419@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:56:18 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MAC00DBZN1UO680@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 14 Sep 2012 19:56:18 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <50534A48.5080805@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:64300 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:16:24 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > CC: occitan@esperanto.org, 12419@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Wouldn't using the "asymmetric" resizing do the job here? I don't > > think the symmetric variant is ever TRT when triggered by resizing the > > minibuffer window. > > Asymmetric resizing doesn't size back correctly when any window but a > bottommost one gets resized while enlarging the minibuffer window. the > idea of asymmetric dragging is that in a configuration like this > > ------------ > | | > | | > ------------ > | | > | | > ------------ > | | > | | > ------------ > > you drag the lower divider up you first get > > ------------ > | | > | | > ------------ > | | > ------------ > | | > | | > | | > ------------ > > and then > > ------------ > | | > ------------ > | | > ------------ > | | > | | > | | > | | > ------------ > > because the idea is that you want to show more in the bottom window. > When you now drag the same divider back you get > > ------------ > | | > ------------ > | | > | | > ------------ > | | > | | > | | > ------------ > > because the idea is to show more of the middle window and then > > ------------ > | | > ------------ > | | > | | > | | > ------------ > | | > | | > ------------ > > which is not the initial configuration. I was talking about mini-window resize, and that alone. I was asking whether using the asymmetric method when the trigger is resize of the mini-window would do the job. Situations where mini-window grows so much as to resize windows other than the one immediately above it are very rare, so I don't think we should be bothered by them, at least not initially.