From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature" Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:01:12 +0200 Message-ID: <83zk48egzb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83lig3yaci.fsf@gnu.org> <505CC1FA.4070300@cs.ucla.edu> <874nmglvp4.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348948899 20438 80.91.229.3 (29 Sep 2012 20:01:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 20:01:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 29 22:01:44 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TI3EN-0006wd-Uq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:01:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43154 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TI3EI-0003Qf-Mg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:01:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38429) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TI3EG-0003PY-P9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:01:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TI3EF-00010H-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:01:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:41567) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TI3EF-000104-Lv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:01:35 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MB400H00NG8FI00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:01:15 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MB400HZMNLX9Y70@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:01:09 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <874nmglvp4.fsf@mail.jurta.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153718 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:31:27 +0300 > > Would be better to increase the number of lines to 24 or 32 > or any other round number. Instead of guessing, I'd suggest a small research: collect all the backtraces reported to the bug tracker, and build the historgram of their sizes. Then decide based on that. I would also suggest some heuristics, e.g. if the crash is in GC, the number will have to be much larger.