From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some (obsolete?) bits here and there Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 17:39:26 +0200 Message-ID: <83zk2y4rwx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <50952850.8090907@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1351957235 13838 80.91.229.3 (3 Nov 2012 15:40:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2012 15:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 03 16:40:44 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TUfpz-0007ok-Fh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:40:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48269 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUfpq-0007OG-SY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 11:40:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUfpo-0007O0-KB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 11:40:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUfpn-0000Pw-EO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 11:40:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:44976) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TUfpn-0000Po-6E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 11:40:31 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MCX00D004SUO400@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 17:39:40 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MCX00DAS4U04LC0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 03 Nov 2012 17:39:36 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <50952850.8090907@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154650 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2012 18:21:04 +0400 > From: Dmitry Antipov > > Is there something important behind inhibit-eval-during-redisplay, > frame-focus and frame-face-alist? What qualifies as "important" for you? > IIUC this is just an outdated stuff which is not used neither by C > nor Lisp code for a long time; is it OK to drop them? inhibit-eval-during-redisplay is a valuable feature for debugging redisplay problems. The other 2 are functions that return non-trivial information; what would be the reason(s) for deleting them?