From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12989: 24.3.50; buffer-file-type is not buffer-local Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 23:26:54 +0200 Message-ID: <83zk25xtk1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pq32pc52.wl%%xmue@d1.dion.ne.jp> <837gp9zkxu.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353878854 27778 80.91.229.3 (25 Nov 2012 21:27:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 21:27:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kzhr@d1.dion.ne.jp, 12989@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 25 22:27:44 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tcjjm-0007VJ-5c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 22:27:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57154 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tcjjb-0000RD-2r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:27:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46178) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcjjY-0000Qx-5q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:27:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcjjX-0003Sh-5R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:27:24 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56610) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TcjjX-0003Sd-28 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:27:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tcjl7-0003NY-S2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:29:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 21:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12989 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 12989-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12989.135387890912948 (code B ref 12989); Sun, 25 Nov 2012 21:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12989) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Nov 2012 21:28:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38628 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tcjka-0003Mn-Lh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:28:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:56084) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TcjkX-0003Mc-Ke for 12989@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:28:27 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0ME200C00BINF500@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 12989@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 23:26:45 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0ME200CRBBKK4J60@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 23:26:45 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:67465 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Kazuhiro Ito , 12989@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:16:13 -0500 > > >> > This variable is meaningful on MS-DOG and Windows NT. > >> ~~~~~~ > > It's not a typo. > > BTW, doesn't Emacs now run under Free Software compatible with > "MS-DOS", right? Probably. I never tried that, so I cannot tell. > If so, could we refer to this instead of MS-DOS/MS-DOG? Its name is not MS-DOS. It's FreeDOS.