From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Blink cursor changes, possible W32 breakage. Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 12:26:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83zjthy438.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83oba22ymd.fsf@gnu.org> <6B4F86F0-164D-4CBE-8CD2-9BC9326451C4@swipnet.se> <8361w93k8e.fsf@gnu.org> <871u6x4we0.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <58D8CF7D-C157-4D48-93B4-2EFFAA4AAF61@swipnet.se> <8338rd2q1h.fsf@gnu.org> <534E99D7-CC13-4C8D-A80B-EC00995F741A@swipnet.se> <83txjt15hw.fsf@gnu.org> <83li550z3l.fsf@gnu.org> <87ip072t8d.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <83vc46zwsy.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1374312389 32541 80.91.229.3 (20 Jul 2013 09:26:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 09:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: miles@gnu.org, jan.h.d@swipnet.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 20 11:26:30 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V0TQr-00067n-1w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 11:26:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38729 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V0TQq-0003tj-JZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 05:26:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V0TQm-0003ta-3X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 05:26:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V0TQk-00073Z-Sv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 05:26:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:37253) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V0TQk-00073U-L6; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 05:26:22 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MQ800200A3HV100@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 12:26:21 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MQ8002GAA7XKR70@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 20 Jul 2013 12:26:21 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:162036 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 04:16:24 -0400 > Cc: jan.h.d@swipnet.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org > > >> AFAIK, and I expect that fairly few users use the features that > >> require timers (jit-lock-stealth and jit-lock-defer). > > I expect most of them do use timer-dependent features all the time. > > Why? You didn't give any reasons for your assertions, either.