From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15045: Point jumps inappropriately around time of Semantic lexing Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 05:41:59 +0300 Message-ID: <83zjssucnc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pptptk9n.fsf@engster.org> <831u65uvzk.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1375929736 32437 80.91.229.3 (8 Aug 2013 02:42:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 02:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15045@debbugs.gnu.org, deng@randomsample.de To: Barry OReilly Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 08 04:42:16 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V7GB6-0007fh-3v for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 04:42:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35152 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7GB5-0006RM-Mf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 22:42:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46621) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7GAy-0006Qu-2b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 22:42:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7GAs-0005A4-Na for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 22:42:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52281) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V7GAs-00059d-L1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 22:42:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V7GAr-0007en-UQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 22:42:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2013 02:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15045 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15045-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15045.137592971829424 (code B ref 15045); Thu, 08 Aug 2013 02:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15045) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Aug 2013 02:41:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46597 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V7GAo-0007eV-2A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 22:41:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:59286) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V7GAk-0007eF-Fs for 15045@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 22:41:55 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MR600H00XXORE00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 15045@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 05:41:47 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MR600HX2Y5LRM00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 08 Aug 2013 05:41:47 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:77070 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 16:39:29 -0400 > From: Barry OReilly > Cc: deng@randomsample.de, 15045@debbugs.gnu.org > > > In the discussion that you cite at the beginning of this bug report, > > I suggested a different approach to finding out the culprit, by > > using the redisplay tracing facility. Can you try that and post the > > results? It might give better clues. > > Though I can't reproduce it at will, I do have a trace-redisplay from > when I saw the bug in a Java file. Specifically, I saw point move > inappropriately, but redisplay didn't need to scroll. It's attached in > case you find it useful. Can you identify the area in this trace where the unwarranted scroll was visible?