From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15298: 24.3.50; Background color lost when highlighting a string Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:08:08 +0200 Message-ID: <83zjo44tuf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86d2oksye6.fsf@somewhere.org> <86wqj8kj8t.fsf@somewhere.org> <86fvpwsqpq.fsf@somewhere.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386950955 19701 80.91.229.3 (13 Dec 2013 16:09:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15298@debbugs.gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 13 17:09:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VrVIj-0005xG-QI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:09:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43317 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrVIj-00059l-0C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:09:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59431) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrVIa-0004yV-EE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:09:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrVIV-0004Gn-1t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:09:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34679) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrVIU-0004Gi-Ul for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrVIT-0005ZP-Ud for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:09:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15298 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 15298-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15298.138695089421356 (code B ref 15298); Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15298) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2013 16:08:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48698 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrVHh-0005YM-Lq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:08:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:59186) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrVHe-0005YA-Cm for 15298@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:08:11 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MXR00A005JM3T00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 15298@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:08:09 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MXR00A9D65K5S00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 18:08:08 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <86fvpwsqpq.fsf@somewhere.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81886 Archived-At: > From: "Sebastien Vauban" > Cc: 15298@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:41:53 +0100 > > > The problem in this case (and other similar ones) is that the face you > > expected was removed, and then another one applied to the same text. > > Removed faces are not recorded anywhere, as you might expect. > > I thought that faces were just added one onto the other, but that the > problem could happen because the order is not the one we expected. The order doesn't matter. the only limitation is that you cannot have more than one text property at the same character with different values of the same property: the latter one overwrites the former one. > Were are faces removed? Font Lock removes them, before it applies its own.