From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16694: Regression by commit 115663 (bzr): Theme face attributes no longer take precedence over X resources Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:18:35 +0200 Message-ID: <83zjlh21ec.fsf@gnu.org> References: <52F601AE.5040309@binary-island.eu> <52FE6BD6.7090607@binary-island.eu> <83txbt4p37.fsf@gnu.org> <83ppmg4yvv.fsf@gnu.org> <530A25EF.6080306@binary-island.eu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393175949 17604 80.91.229.3 (23 Feb 2014 17:19:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 17:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16694@debbugs.gnu.org To: Matthias Dahl Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 23 18:19:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WHchw-0001B0-D0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:19:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53636 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHchv-0003iq-Tt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 12:19:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHchn-0003iI-Ph for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 12:19:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHchi-0002zT-Vl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 12:19:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35562) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WHchi-0002zN-SU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 12:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WHchi-000342-GC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 12:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 17:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16694 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16694-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16694.139317593811769 (code B ref 16694); Sun, 23 Feb 2014 17:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16694) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2014 17:18:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36744 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WHche-00033k-50 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 12:18:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:35565) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WHcha-00033U-Mb for 16694@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 12:18:56 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1G00800L1OHU00@mtaout26.012.net.il> for 16694@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:16:58 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1G00783LCAPI20@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:16:58 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <530A25EF.6080306@binary-island.eu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86075 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 17:46:39 +0100 > From: Matthias Dahl > CC: Stefan Monnier , 16694@debbugs.gnu.org > > > If no one objects in a couple of days, I think we should install it. > > Good to hear. If you don't mind, I'd like to take a closer look again > and probably revise the original comments to match the new behavior. > Also, maybe add a second patch to pull the check up into the utility > function itself and refactor the few bits and pieces where it is used > accordingly. I'll try to get this done within the next few days. Sure, please do, and thanks. > > Stefan "who experiences bug#16378 all the time" > > I had a look at the description of bug #16378 but unfortunately I > couldn't make head or tail of it. If you don't mind filling me in, I'd > try to track this one down as well. You mean, you couldn't reproduce the problem? Or do you mean something else?