From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17671: 24.3.91; RET on a link in *Help* buffer resizes *Help* Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 13:54:36 +0300 Message-ID: <83zjhu8dqr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k38z9mlr.fsf@gnu.org> <538D7794.7050303@gmx.at> <837g4ya0yf.fsf@gnu.org> <538D9861.6070608@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401798504 13500 80.91.229.3 (3 Jun 2014 12:28:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 12:28:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17671@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 03 14:28:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wrnp9-00047I-Ns for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 14:28:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51801 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrmPw-0001cD-6f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 06:58:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54362) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrmN2-0007zm-Fd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 06:55:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrmMx-0005J8-2s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 06:55:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42762) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WrmMx-0005IQ-09 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 06:55:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WrmMw-0005l4-37 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 06:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 10:55:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17671 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17671-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17671.140179289422108 (code B ref 17671); Tue, 03 Jun 2014 10:55:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17671) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2014 10:54:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41639 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WrmMn-0005kU-0R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 06:54:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:36481) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WrmMk-0005k8-7z for 17671@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 06:54:51 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N6L00H009YUL300@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 17671@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 13:54:43 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N6L00HM0AB7HE30@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Tue, 03 Jun 2014 13:54:43 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <538D9861.6070608@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89937 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 11:41:53 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > CC: 17671@debbugs.gnu.org > > Maybe we should not _decrease_ the size of a window when displaying > another buffer in it - this would take care of your use case. Sounds good to me.