From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generalize start-process with keyword args
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:13:20 +0200
Message-ID: <83zj7aw23z.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m3mw3h46f7.fsf-ueno@gnu.org>
	<jwvy4n1qddx.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<87d24d3uwz.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <m3ioe1pkfz.fsf_-_-ueno@gnu.org>
	<jwvlhixjcht.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<m38uew4bce.fsf-ueno@gnu.org>
	<jwv7fugtj4r.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<m34mpk47i0.fsf-ueno@gnu.org>
	<jwv3853vdrb.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <83pp87y6iu.fsf@gnu.org>
	<jwva8zbts2p.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <83mw3bxz9f.fsf@gnu.org>
	<jwv4mpjcnnn.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<83k2yfx8zi.fsf@gnu.org> <m3pp86omm4.fsf-ueno@gnu.org>
	<83fv92xojm.fsf@gnu.org> <jwvmw3arv7s.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426706221 28689 80.91.229.3 (18 Mar 2015 19:17:01 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 19:17:01 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ueno@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 18 20:16:51 2015
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1YYJSU-0003r3-Ff
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 20:16:50 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35374 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1YYJST-00020d-MS
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:16:49 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53389)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1YYJPJ-00056b-Ox
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:13:37 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1YYJPF-0006Ek-MG
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:13:33 -0400
Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:61662)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1YYJPF-0006EO-E0; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:13:29 -0400
Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by
	a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id
	<0NLF00500976I800@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>;
	Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:13:27 +0200 (IST)
Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il
	(HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id
	<0NLF005I69EFK300@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>;
	Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:13:27 +0200 (IST)
In-reply-to: <jwvmw3arv7s.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10
X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184003
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/184003>

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Daiki Ueno <ueno@gnu.org>,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:57:18 -0400
> 
> > I could support a thorough eradication of this convention from all
> > related interfaces.
> 
> Then let's do that.

Yes, let's.