From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22012: 25.1.50; gdb broken by (json-string-format "doesn't start with `\"'!") Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:58:25 +0200 Message-ID: <83ziy0tzge.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5655F4AD.4020503@gmx.at> <56566FD1.2050305@yandex.ru> <5656C1BE.400@gmx.at> <5656E430.8030809@yandex.ru> <565709C9.8080306@gmx.at> <56571697.50702@yandex.ru> <56573A2E.5000809@gmx.at> <56574326.1070403@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448560939 16824 80.91.229.3 (26 Nov 2015 18:02:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:02:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22012@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 26 19:02:06 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a20ru-00037K-AS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:02:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52651 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a20rw-000109-OW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:02:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41184) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a20rt-0000xJ-Fx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:02:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a20rq-0001Xt-A3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:02:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36703) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a20rq-0001Xp-6m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a20rp-0001jf-Q4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:02:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22012 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22012-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22012.14485608666613 (code B ref 22012); Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22012) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Nov 2015 18:01:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54644 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a20qw-0001ib-FK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:01:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:63492) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a20qc-0001hm-A6 for 22012@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:01:05 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NYF00E00NZDPQ00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 22012@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:58:41 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NYF00ECXOLSNG70@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:58:41 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <56574326.1070403@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109305 Archived-At: > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:36:38 +0200 > > Basically, the question is whether we're calling json-read in a wrong > buffer, or if the buffer is right but contains unparseable content, or > if we fail to parse valid JSON. Definitely not the first alternative. Either the 2nd or the 3rd.